Posts tagged Browsers
Legalizing TPB, Slim PS3, Mobile Office Web Apps, and more
Aug 20th
Tech News roundup for August 19, 2009.
- How The Pirate Bay will be legalized #
- Sony unveils slim PS3, price-drops #
- Blogger “strike” in Italy #
- Office Web Applications will support mobile browsers #
- Opinion: Why AT&T killed Google Voice #
- More on my FriendFeed at friendfeed.com/aceontech
How The Pirate Bay will be legalized
GGF – the company which is to acquire The Pirate Bay – has laid out its plan on how it thinks it will be able to legalize the notorious torrent sharing site. It proposes, as it had stated before, to start charging for the use of the site. Use of TBP would include downloading as well as uploading (sharing) of files. It’s not yet set in stone how steep the subscription fee will be, but GGF has stated it would grant copyright holders two options if they object to the free sharing of a certain file. The way they hope to ‘legalize’ TBP is to offer either a financial contribution with each download or pull down certain torrents at request. If copyright holders collectively go for the latter, I imagine TBP won’t continue to exist much longer. Also GGF hopes to establish partnerships with the entertainment industry and possibly start offering ‘official’ paid torrents. Source at TorrentFreak.
Sony unveils slim PS3, price-drops
True to Sony’s track-record and business cycle, it will be putting out a slimmer version of the PS3 somewhere in September. It will allegedly take up 33% less space and suck 34% less power. Sony’s also offering the console at lower prices, near to $300 US for the lower-end model and $400 US for the higher end model. Source at NewsWeek.
Blogger “strike” in Italy
Because of the impending Italian laws that could cause independent bloggers and content creators to have to pay fees if they refuse to pull down content, bloggers decided to have a strike to counter it. The Italian blogosphere went quiet for one day, but one might wonder, is this the way to achieve something? One would rather think it would be more efficient to make more of a raucous instead of plainly shutting up… Source at TechDirt.
Office Web Applications will support mobile browsers
Microsoft’s release of Office 2010 will bring along version 1 of Office Web Applications, the full Office suite for the web, for free. Features will be limited, of course. For only so many features are useful for the web. The surprise here will be that not only all major browsers will be supported, but that mobile browser will also get full support. Microsoft is essentially giving Office away for free to millions of users, including Linux and Mac users alike. Source at ArsTechnica.
Also, read Paul Thurrott’s preview of Office Web Applications 2010.
Opinion: Why AT&T killed Google Voice
Andy Kessler from WSJ writes: “Telecom operators are yesterday’s business. It’s time for a national data policy that encourages innovation” and opines why AT&T pulled Google Voice for the iPhone. The article also broadens its spectrum (pun) and calls for unifying voice traffic and cable distribution to become mere data traffic – making matters more neutral and ultimately cheaper. Source at WSJ.
Please, let me rant about Microsoft's ballot screen and the EU
Aug 3rd
First off, let me say one thing before I initiate my disgust-laden rant: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarggggggggggggh. It may not be as relieving as actually screaming it out loud, but what the bleep’s going on with the EU?! Before I continue my mile-high rant, it may be interesting to sketch the background of this story, especially for those who haven’t been following the happenings leading up to this outright farce…
Microsoft vs. EU: A short history
The EU has developed a disliking to the Redmond-based software giant and has sued Microsoft over numerous of its anti-competitive strategies, mainly related to the bundling of Internet Explorer and Windows. Microsoft is also currently being held liable for several other anti-trust cases. The EU’s antipathy for Microsoft spiked after Microsoft reached a complete monopoly in the browser market. Because bundling is illegal in Europe, Microsoft was forced to pay a big fine to the EU some time ago and sell ‘N’ (nitwit?) editions of Windows. These N-versions are regular versions of Windows bereft of Windows Media Player — and never sold a single copy.
The whole issue flared up once more in recent events when Opera – a EU-based browser company sporting a pathetically low market-share – called on Microsoft for “being unfair” and stifling competition in the web browser market by its own browser with Windows.
Microsoft’s reaction to this was to remove Internet Explorer entirely from its upcoming operating system ‘Windows 7’. Initially, this would only be applied to EU-territory and consequentially, the Windows 7 E edition was born. This was a harsh measure, decidedly put in place to taunt the EU into dismissing the whole thing.
Shortly thereafter, the E-edition was yanked because — no kidding — it would cause unnecessary complications to Microsoft’s partners and would incur too much confusion to Microsoft’s European customers (said the EU).
Thus, in response, Opera “proposed” to introduce the “browser ballot screen” to Windows 7.
Ballot screen?
Ballot as in voting, yes. Microsoft has confirmed it would pursue this proposal to satisfy the EU’s demands:
Unless Opera acts up again, this will likely be the final design of the ballot screen. Microsoft specified that as many as eight browsers are to be displayed, sorted by market share. Yes Opera, you’re fifth down the list. Bummer.
In addition, Microsoft will retroactively be pushing this screen to Windows XP and Vista via Windows Update. A far reaching measure. Way too far if you ask me.
This is bad for the end user
While Opera argues that this is beneficial for the end user because it ensues the freedom of choice, I simply say it’s bull.
Opera, to its credit, got to market first with technology that is now mainstream in almost all browsers (tabs, etc.), but has failed miserably to grab an honorable spot in the browser market. Opera has been around far longer than most of the other browser makers, but still, after so many years pretty much no one would be caught dead using the darn thing. Firefox – for obvious enough reasons – made humongous strides in nipping away at IE’s market share. In a complimentary fashion both Apple’s Safari and Google’s Chrome rose above Opera without ghastly efforts.
This ‘bullshit screen’ will only confuse [normal] people since many won’t even know what a browser really is (it’s the Internet, Ma!). They just want to surf the web and go about their daily business. How does the average Joe even distinguish whether one browser is better than the other, anyway?
I just don’t think Microsoft should have caved to the likes of an insignificant player like Opera. After all, an operating system should come with a browser in order to get your hands on another one, right (in the light of the E-editions)? Besides, those who are techie enough are up to speed on browsers and will get Firefox if they are so inclined. Others shouldn’t be bothered and get the best browser the market has to offer novice users (read: Internet Explorer or Firefox, NOT Opera).
Anyhow, it’s not like Microsoft holds 90% of the market anymore. A product or service is only monopolistic if it’s the only viable thing to choose from. The mere fact that there are eight browser to display in the ballot screen shows anyone with an ounce of brains that there’s enough diversity to choose from in the browser space.
Bottom line:
Up yours, Opera
Perhaps there’s something wrong with Opera itself. Perhaps? No, I’ll tell you what’s wrong with Opera: their product isn’t in the least compelling and nor is it very impressive. It’s competent – sure – but that’s where their story ends. Maybe they should try [positive] marketing..?
So Opera – in my opinion the most childish company of late – tries to gain market share by forcing Microsoft into a stranglehold by leveraging the EU’s preconceived aversion toward Microsoft. And they’re winning. Microsoft should have fought back on this one.
It’s easy to predict what will happen once Mr. End User sees this. He’ll pick one of the first two icons. And no one will go for Opera’s little icon, no matter how loud a raucous Opera causes. And it’ll be what Opera’s got coming to them. I’m already looking forward to it.
As much as I want to continue on, I’d better stop here. I got my point across
.
P.S.: Opera’s logo looks like a big zero, it really does.
The Opera Browser Revisited
Dec 1st
Update: DrLaunch mentioned a good link which compares the Top 150 Firefox extensions to Opera’s widgets, here.
I’ve been a Firefox user for a long time. In fact, I think I was there from the very beginning, back when it was still called Phoenix (in alpha stage). It’s been my browser of preference for years and it’s most unlikely I’ll ever switch to anything else. Although, lately some issues with Firefox 2 have been cropping up, like frequent crashes under Windows Vista and lagging performance in Ubuntu (7.10). Naturally, let us not forget the memory leakage galore.

Why would someone still hang on to something like this? I guess I’m just set in my ways when about web browsing. And so are so many others with Internet Explorer, I reckon. Opera, on the other hand, has always triggered my curiosity. It’s seems so underexposed, while it does look like a solid piece of software. I’ve tried using it in the past, but dismissed it because of the embedded ads. Recently, the application was made ad-free, hoping to attract more users.
I’ve tested the latest stable build of Opera (version 9.24) on Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon (7.10).
Installation
The nice thing about Ubuntu Linux is that it allows you to install applications from its central repository, excluding the need to look for an installer-file on the internet. If you wanted to do this, of course, you could. I just picked the easy way out and installed it via the Synaptic package manager. It didn’t take much to install Opera, of course, so it was up and running quickly.
At first glance
The compact layout of the UI leaves a lot of room for actual browsing and might give the wrong impression. Opera is an impressive browser and includes: tabbed browsing (Opera was the pioneer in the field), integrated search, extensions, bittorrent-support and many less significant – yet nice to have – features.
Slow AJAX. CPU hog?
Opera claims its browser is the fastest around, but frankly, I wasn’t able to measure any substantial difference. It didn’t load web pages significantly faster, nor did it slower. I did find it to run AJAX a heck of a lot slower than Firefox or even Internet Explorer. Flickr.com’s “Organize”-pages executed nastily slowly. In the end I close the whole shebang down and went back to Firefox in order to get my album organized on Flickr.
While the laptop I’m testing this on is fairly recent and decent (Dell XPS M1710 — September 2007), I started noticing heavy CPU loads (50% and more) after a few minutes for no apparent reason.
Customization
In contrast with Firefox’ infinite supply of extensions, Opera is gravely lacking. To remedy this, Opera put in the effort of implementing something called Widgets. Yes, like OS X’ and even Vista’s Gadgets — but tailored for web browsing. I’m not sure anyone needs even more gadgets, for I doubt their usefulness in the long run.
Widgets are the only means of customization and Opera’s Community site for Widgets offers counterparts to many of Firefox’ popular extensions. Yet, in my opinion, they’re lacking due to their form-factor: floating about on your desktop like.. widgets. Only at reduced window size would you be able to utilize the gadgets, for they would otherwise obstruct your view on what’s happening on the webpages. They just don’t seem to do what you’d expect them to.
The high resolution (1920 * 1200) on my screen enables me to scale down the browsing window and display widgets side-by-side. I’m pretty comfortable working this way, but I know many people prefer full-screen browsing or just aren’t equipped with enough screen real-estate. Bummer (I like Firefox’ extensions better).
Extra tab functionality (see figure above)
Apart from it being laden with keyboard shortcuts, it’s also got a nifty feature called the “Speed Dial”. It works like the similarly named function on a cellphone: assign a number to a certain site and use a keyboard shortcut to access it quickly in a new tab (mapped to CTRL+[number] by default). Neat.
Sadly enough, due to Opera’s crippled AJAX support, pre-fetching of websites is snail-paced (as seen in picture above). I couldn’t even get Google Reader to work from the speed dial.
Just the average browser after all
All in all, Opera’s Browser is a decent one that’ll do the job just like IE and Firefox will. While I must admit some issues may be Linux-based (I didn’t perform any tests on Windows), 50% CPU load for a mere browser is unacceptable to me. Don’t get me wrong though: I like Opera. I just can’t part with Firefox (yet?).
Opera is a power-user browser — to some extent. A real power user wants extensions, though.



